| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Jim
Along with comments from Dave I thought it might be worth mentioning a few more points. Think of 900MHz as line of sight and any obstruction is an issue to plan for. It is worth keeping the antenna gain low because of wave slap action tilting the structure and radiation pattern. Also consider mounting it as high as you can off the water surface, say a few metres. Hopefully this will allow for the device rolling into a wave trough whilst still giving you reasonable range. The best analogy here is to replace the antenna with a lamp and se how far you can see it from. If you end up needing high antenna gain consider gimballing the antenna to keep it oriented properly. I'd stick to providing the gain at the ship/shore end though. If multipath reflections and cancellations are a problem (and honestly I dont think they are in a water/wave environment - more an issue between trees and buildings) then consider a horizontal antenna like a halo, bent dipole or "3 leaf clover". The plus with a horizontal is that the antenna aperture is wide rather than high so phase cancellations are much less of a problem. You should also consider that what ever data you are sending might be lost periodically so whatever it is make sure there is a forward error correction or retry mechanism where needed. Cheers Bob VK2YQA jmorash wrote: thanks for any suggestions --Jim Morash |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| On Topic | Shortwave | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
| Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod | Scanner | |||
| Outdoor Scanner antenna and eventually a reference to SW reception | Shortwave | |||