Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 5th 05, 03:20 PM
Ralph E Lindberg
 
Posts: n/a
Default 900MHz antenna at sea surface

In article .com,
"jmorash" wrote:

....

thanks for any suggestions
--Jim Morash



Jim, I've read through the responses you have had and allow me to inject
some real world additions. You see I work for the Navy and we have built
things a lot like what you are talking about and getting the antenna
some height above the water is a requirement. It's actually rather easy
to do. A simple fiberglass mast will do it, counter balancing the added
weight is easy, since there needs to be enough mass below the surface to
balance some sea state conditions


Here is a link to the Newport tracking system
http://www.npt.nuwc.navy.mil/autec/barts01.htm This isn't the one we
did, but if shows you some ideas

The system people I work with developed, use a different buoy system
but works almost the same.

I did some experiments with antennas (900MHz) just as sea level (OK 3
feet above) and could still get a solid connection at about 1 mile, when
I raised them to 6 ft I got a solid connection at 5 miles.

Other considerations.. the antenna mast whips a lot and makes recovery
(in rough water) a little interesting. There is going to be a switch
from the simple ground-plane antenna to a disc-cone due to the danger
the ground radials pose.

We also found that putting a LED based flasher on the bouy a real
good idea (to see it in low light conditions)

--
--------------------------------------------------------
Personal e-mail is the n7bsn but at amsat.org
This posting address is a spam-trap and seldom read
RV and Camping FAQ can be found at
http://www.ralphandellen.us/rv
  #2   Report Post  
Old November 9th 05, 06:55 PM
jmorash
 
Posts: n/a
Default 900MHz antenna at sea surface

Thanks Ralph, good to get some actual numbers on use of 900MHz at sea!
I'm not sure if we can quite manage a 6' mast (this is not a buoy, but
a mobile vehicle) but clearly more height is better. We already use a
strobe to see the vehicle at night, it does help a lot.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
On Topic [email protected] Shortwave 5 November 2nd 05 10:35 AM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod Soliloquy Scanner 11 October 11th 03 01:36 AM
Outdoor Scanner antenna and eventually a reference to SW reception Soliloquy Shortwave 2 September 29th 03 04:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017