Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard Fry" wrote in message
... "Dave Pitzer" wrote ... Is there any place I can find polar graphs of commercial broadcast station's antenna patterns? ___________________ Dave, Here http://www.radio-locator.com/ is a link to a website with calculated coverage areas/contours for US AM broadcast stations. The contours are based on their licensed radiation patterns (directional or not), AND ground conductivities for the geographic regions concerned. The polar radiation patterns of these stations most probably don't look much like these plots, because of the heavy influence that ground conductivity has on received field strength along the various azimuth bearings. Even the real coverage contours of AM broadcast stations using omni antennas usually are anything but omni, due to the effects of varying ground conductivities around their various azimuth sectors and ranges. Have fun. Just a FYI...the contour maps at Radio-Locator.com are WRONG....the LOCAL on FM maps is actually the distant or Service Contour (1mv or 60dbu level)..LOCAL is defined as City Grade or 70dbu or 3.16mV level...which they do not show..On AM, they show lower levels on the map as well...If you want to really know what the signal level should be, draw another circle or line inside the LOCAL one they show...about the same distance between the LOCAL and Distant they show...Your line drawn will be local, their local becomes Distant and their Distant becomes Finge... Their Fringe is now DX ![]() Chris WB5ITT |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"CWB" wrote:
Just a FYI...the contour maps at Radio-Locator.com are WRONG ....the LOCAL on FM maps is actually the distant or Service Contour (1mv or 60dbu level)..LOCAL is defined as City Grade or 70dbu or 3.16mV level...which they do not show..On AM, they show lower levels on the map as well. _____________ Their maps DO correctly show the distances to the contours for the field strengths they identify. Radio-Locator picked different field strength values for the "local" etc contours than those used by the FCC, but that doesn't invalidate the Radio-Locator maps. And their choices are reasonable. For example on AM, a 2.5 mV/m signal (Radio-Locator's local contour) does provide good service to a typical cheap table radio inside a home in an urban setting. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
178 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | CB | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (01-NOV-03) | Shortwave |