LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12   Report Post  
Old November 25th 03, 08:45 PM
Richard Harrison
 
Posts: n/a
Default

K1YW wrote:
"Artsci takes into account:
To properly estimate a signal`s range, you must have a few important
figures----

Frequency / Band
Transmitter power (in watts)
Antenna height (from sea level)
Antenna gain (net after coax loss)

As a practical matter, first you must have a line-of-sight path. Then
you can worry about path attenuation, gains, losses, transmitter power
and receiver sensitivity.

Attenuation between stations with an obstructed path (including earth
bulge) rises so rapidly with the obstruction that non of the other
factors matters except in the case of brute force communication, such as
atmospheric scatter.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 11:22 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 08:44 PM
Ten-tec vee beam Tom Coates Antenna 8 September 21st 03 01:47 AM
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? Dr. Slick Antenna 255 July 30th 03 12:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017