Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
K1YW wrote:
"Artsci takes into account: To properly estimate a signal`s range, you must have a few important figures---- Frequency / Band Transmitter power (in watts) Antenna height (from sea level) Antenna gain (net after coax loss) As a practical matter, first you must have a line-of-sight path. Then you can worry about path attenuation, gains, losses, transmitter power and receiver sensitivity. Attenuation between stations with an obstructed path (including earth bulge) rises so rapidly with the obstruction that non of the other factors matters except in the case of brute force communication, such as atmospheric scatter. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Ten-tec vee beam | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |