Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Group,
Recently,I put up a linear-loaded dipole for 160-10m. It's ladderline,4/1 balun, to coax,to good brand auto-tuner. It's supposed to work with 100ft. of ladderline,BUT.... It wouldn't cover the lower portions of 160. To get this antenna to work on 160, I had to cut off 20ft. of ladderline, AND also use a 50ft. piece of coax! I tried using only 20ft. of coax because that's all I need to get to my tuner,but it didn't work! ! ! What happened here, to me,goes against almost everything that I learned about feedlines! Change the lenth of coax ? The 100ft. of ladderline was at least 1/4 wavelenth of 160,right? The feedpoint is at 55ft. on a tower ( about 2ft. away the tower) the ends are in an inverted-"V" at about 15ft. above the ground. I do have a 80m/ 272ft. loop also in the 1/8 of an acre back yard. Some small 2 & 6m beams hung of the tower,not near enough to cause intereaction. WHY AM I HAVING such a hard time getting this antenna to cover this bandspread ??? Also, IF I have a multi-band antenna,feed with ladderline ONLY, to a very good tuner; Why are the signals that I rercieve on the higher bands,(160-10m) usually SO LOW in strength ? Ex: On 160 or 80,the antennas s-meter usually reads over s-9 at night,o.k. Now, the same antenna on 10m or 20m during the day are reading very low; mostly around 3's and 4's. I guess that I really don't think that calling THESE antennas "a 160-10m antenna" or my Loop a 80-10m antenna! ! I've had both antennas up now for at least a month. Signals for 20m-10m need a different antenna, In my opinion. BUT, I'm still trying to understand exactly just WHAT antennas can or cannot do for me. 73's,and keep radio-active, Paladin |