LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13   Report Post  
Old November 29th 05, 09:28 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Jim Kelley
 
Posts: n/a
Default Antenna reception theory



Cecil Moore wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote:

The field itself is the same, whether it varies in time or not.



I wonder if that's true when taken out of context? :-)

I'm no physicist but wouldn't a static electric field
be made up of virtual photons while a dynamic electric
field would be made up of non-virtual photons?


Non-virtual photons, as opposed virtual non-photons I presume. I think
physicists know they're going to have to wait until they get to the
pearly gates before they can really learn what "electric fields are made
out of". ;-)

73, jk

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 11:22 PM
significance of feedline orientation Brian Shortwave 6 October 22nd 04 02:43 AM
Question for better antenna mavens than I Tony Meloche Shortwave 7 October 28th 03 10:16 AM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 08:44 PM
Outdoor Scanner antenna and eventually a reference to SW reception Soliloquy Shortwave 2 September 29th 03 05:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017