Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Asimov wrote:
"Terman sucks." Termn`s writings have been exposed for anyone to criticize for most of a century. His 1955 edition has been out there for 50 years. No retractions or corrections are necessary. Detection of static E-fields is not relevant. Charles Coulomb in 1785 showed electric charges exert forces on each other that are inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. This was the birth of the "inverse square law" as Coulomb`s discovery applies to magnetic attraction and repulsion, too. In an electromagnetic field, propagation depends upon the electric field begetting a magnetic field and vice versa. On average, each field contains 50% of the total energy. The electromagnetic field of an antenna could be calculated from the distribution of voltage on the conductors. Problem is voltmeter leads would be in the r-f field and this would tend to make measured voltages inaccurate. R-F current is conveniently and accurately measured with a thermocouple ammeter. Strength of an electromagnetic wave is usually measured and quoted in terms of its electric field in volts per meter. This is the number of volts which would be induced in a one-meter length of wire placed in the field parallel to the electric lines of force. Volts in the wire are produced by movement of magnetic flux across the wire. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
significance of feedline orientation | Shortwave | |||
Question for better antenna mavens than I | Shortwave | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Outdoor Scanner antenna and eventually a reference to SW reception | Shortwave |