Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
Wave P1 contains 75 watts and Wave P2 contains 8.33 watts. Without a source of constructive interference energy, they cannot add up to 133.33 watts. And obviously he still doesn't believe it, Gene. Without the 2*SQRT(P1*P2)=50w constructive interference energy, 75w + 8.33w will *NEVER* add up to 133.33 watts. Dr. Best's equation, 75w + 8.33w = 133.33w, is superposition of powers which is not allowed AND a violation of the conservation of energy principle. You don't really support superposition of powers and violations of conservation of energy, do you?. If you furnish exactly 75 watts and your neighbor furnishes exactly 8.33 watts, can you power a 133.33 watt device? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
significance of feedline orientation | Shortwave | |||
Question for better antenna mavens than I | Shortwave | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Outdoor Scanner antenna and eventually a reference to SW reception | Shortwave |