LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old December 5th 05, 06:40 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default Antenna reception theory

Jim Kelley wrote:
Wave P1 contains 75 watts and Wave P2 contains 8.33 watts.
Without a source of constructive interference energy, they cannot
add up to 133.33 watts.


And obviously he still doesn't believe it, Gene.


Without the 2*SQRT(P1*P2)=50w constructive interference energy,
75w + 8.33w will *NEVER* add up to 133.33 watts. Dr. Best's
equation, 75w + 8.33w = 133.33w, is superposition of powers
which is not allowed AND a violation of the conservation of
energy principle. You don't really support superposition of
powers and violations of conservation of energy, do you?.

If you furnish exactly 75 watts and your neighbor furnishes
exactly 8.33 watts, can you power a 133.33 watt device?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
significance of feedline orientation Brian Shortwave 6 October 22nd 04 01:43 AM
Question for better antenna mavens than I Tony Meloche Shortwave 7 October 28th 03 09:16 AM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
Outdoor Scanner antenna and eventually a reference to SW reception Soliloquy Shortwave 2 September 29th 03 04:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017