LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old December 6th 05, 07:37 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Gene Fuller
 
Posts: n/a
Default Antenna reception theory

Cecil,

The waves you are so worried about are merely convenient, but
fictitious, adjuncts to your mathematical model.

You need worry only about the energy of real, measurable waves, not
those adjuncts that simplify the math.

The use of such adjuncts is done frequently in solving real problems.
Just don't confuse the internals of the model with physical reality.

73,
Gene,
W4SZ

Cecil Moore wrote:
There is still an underlying Q&A about what happens to the energy
in those waves. The energy concept is in addition to what's already
there, not any kind of replacement for it.

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
significance of feedline orientation Brian Shortwave 6 October 22nd 04 01:43 AM
Question for better antenna mavens than I Tony Meloche Shortwave 7 October 28th 03 09:16 AM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
Outdoor Scanner antenna and eventually a reference to SW reception Soliloquy Shortwave 2 September 29th 03 04:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017