Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil,
The waves you are so worried about are merely convenient, but fictitious, adjuncts to your mathematical model. You need worry only about the energy of real, measurable waves, not those adjuncts that simplify the math. The use of such adjuncts is done frequently in solving real problems. Just don't confuse the internals of the model with physical reality. 73, Gene, W4SZ Cecil Moore wrote: There is still an underlying Q&A about what happens to the energy in those waves. The energy concept is in addition to what's already there, not any kind of replacement for it. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
significance of feedline orientation | Shortwave | |||
Question for better antenna mavens than I | Shortwave | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Outdoor Scanner antenna and eventually a reference to SW reception | Shortwave |