Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene Fuller wrote:
Cecil, The waves you are so worried about are merely convenient, but fictitious, adjuncts to your mathematical model. You need worry only about the energy of real, measurable waves, not those adjuncts that simplify the math. The use of such adjuncts is done frequently in solving real problems. Just don't confuse the internals of the model with physical reality. 73, Gene, W4SZ Might this be an example, Gene? From "An Energy Analysis at an Impedance Discontinuity in an RF Transmission Line, Part I" "100% wave cancellation means 100% energy reflection." 73 de ac6xg |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
significance of feedline orientation | Shortwave | |||
Question for better antenna mavens than I | Shortwave | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Outdoor Scanner antenna and eventually a reference to SW reception | Shortwave |