Gene Fuller wrote:
The waves you are so worried about are merely convenient, but
fictitious, adjuncts to your mathematical model.

Let's see:
1. Canceled waves are "fictitious adjuncts to my math model".
2. Therefore, they don't need to be canceled, because they
are only "fictitious adjuncts to my math model".
3. Therefore, we can remove whatever is doing the canceling
of those "fictitious adjuncts" without changing anything.
4. Darn, how is it that I can see those "fictitious adjuncts
to my math model" so well that I can't see anything else?

What's wrong with this picture? Could there be a not-so-hidden
contradiction accompanied by confusion of cause and effect?

You need worry only about the energy of real, measurable waves, not
those adjuncts that simplify the math.

You don't even know me, Gene. Where do you get the balls to
decide what I need to worry about and what I don't need to
worry about? I have been worried and needing an energy analysis
model for 40 years. I now have one and can now sleep like a baby
at night, but no thanks to you. :-)
--
73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp