LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old December 6th 05, 10:15 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Gene Fuller
 
Posts: n/a
Default Antenna reception theory

Cecil,

Sorry, I mistakenly thought the discussion was about technology.
Silly me!

Since it is actually about psychology, not physics, I am outta here.

73,
Gene
W4SZ

Cecil Moore wrote:

You don't even know me, Gene. Where do you get the balls to
decide what I need to worry about and what I don't need to
worry about? I have been worried and needing an energy analysis
model for 40 years. I now have one and can now sleep like a baby
at night, but no thanks to you. :-)

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
significance of feedline orientation Brian Shortwave 6 October 22nd 04 01:43 AM
Question for better antenna mavens than I Tony Meloche Shortwave 7 October 28th 03 09:16 AM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
Outdoor Scanner antenna and eventually a reference to SW reception Soliloquy Shortwave 2 September 29th 03 04:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017