Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg, G4FGQ wrote:
"Just a number please." Given 1 volt per m as the field strength, and a 1-m antenna parallel to the electric vector of the wave, the open-circuit voltage at the end of the wire is 1 volt. The best you can get across the receiver input is 0.5 volt when there is a conjugate match between the receiver and the antennna. Most of the explanations are irrelevant when the field strength is specified at the antenna. Terman preached scientific gospel. He had proof to back what he said. In Terman`s 1943 "Radio Engineers` Handbook" he wrote: "The strength of a radio wave is expressed in terms of the voltage stress produced in space by the electric field of the wave, and is usually expressed in either millivolts or microvolts stress per meter. The stress expressed this way is exactly the same voltage that the magnetic flux of the wave induces in a conductor one meter long when rhe wave sweeps across the conductor with the velocity of light." This is found on page 770. There is no qualification or equivocation. Terman also posts the same statement with no change in substance on page 2 of his 1955 edition of "Electronic and Radio Engineerinng". It means what it plainly says. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
significance of feedline orientation | Shortwave | |||
Question for better antenna mavens than I | Shortwave | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Outdoor Scanner antenna and eventually a reference to SW reception | Shortwave |