Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark, KB7QHC wrote:
"In land stations the actual effective height is from 50 to 90% of the measured height." If the effective height is 50%, volts at the antenna terminals are no more than 50% numericcally of the volts per meter in the field strength when all else is optimum. This could account for Reg`s 2 to 1 discrepancy. I wonder what the speculations of Reg and his Icelandic correspondent are? Do they have a formula to predict effective height? Does Roy have such a formula? It`s a factor which won`t go away, even when ignored.. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
significance of feedline orientation | Shortwave | |||
Question for better antenna mavens than I | Shortwave | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Outdoor Scanner antenna and eventually a reference to SW reception | Shortwave |