Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 19:56:06 GMT, Gene Fuller
wrote: Steve, Sorry, you are the one who is furthering the lightning rod myth. There is no way a "true lightning rod" bleeds off enough charge to avoid a strike. That idea is about 99% urban legend. I suggest perusal of the Polyphaser web site. There is a lot of good information there. One relevant comment is: "The real solution for lightning protection is to have control of the strike energy. To do this, a well-designed ground system will be a better investment than cluttering up the top of the tower." I'd be a bit careful about that statement on a site for a company who makes their money from attempting to control the energy when lightening strikes, rather than preventing the strike. There are two distinct camps. The one that says the solution is to control the strike and the other says to prevent the strike. Lightening strikes are unpredictable in most cases, but if you have the tallest structure around the odds are that it will get hit before lower nearby structures. The cluttering refers to a bottlebrush arrangement of multiple sharp points, but the same idea applies to a single sharp point. According to our electrical inspector it's not a myth, but I don't know one way or another. However I do know that it would take little to bleed a charge and a lot to control a strike. I also know that every tall structure at the chemical company where I used to work had lightening rods Bleeding supposedly does just that. I prevents the charge from building up to a potential that will help bridge the gap to the feeders. The last class I had at work on electrical safety was pro lightening rods AND ground systems. (as was the one for skywarn from the NWS) I do use polyphasers and end up replacing one every now and then. My tower gets hit on average of three times per year. Since the tower went up there have been no strikes to any home within about 5 lots from me. There haven't been any really close strikes that didn't hit the tower. (of which I am aware). The neighbors are quick to tell me, "Man you shouldda been home this afternoon when the lightening hit your tower". That happened in August this year. They were really impressed and more so in that we had no damage even to the radios which do not get disconnected. My antenna ground system has over 600 feet of bare #2 copper wire with 30 grounding rods, not counting the two ground rods for the house electrical system and the one for the shop. They have separate feeds, but as my computer network ties it all together, I'm thinking of bonding the grounds for both services together and to the system ground. I have visions of a lightening strike to one system and reaching ground in the other by going through the 130 feet of cat-5 cable. There's a reason I back up everything on CDs and DVDs. You'll have to fix the return add due to dumb virus checkers, not spam Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair?) www.rogerhalstead.com snip |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Grounding question - this is wierd..... | Antenna |