Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 11:51:14 -0800, "Jim"
wrote: The phase velocity for most coax cables are similar, so I'd use RG-8 since that accepts type N connectors reasonably well. The impedance bump caused by a thinner cable being adapted to type N cables would be noticeable especially at higher frequencies. The only major question is whether the original cables had a different velocity factor, and that I can't answer so I'd use the RG-8 and it should be close enough. Is the Zo of RG8 52 ohms? Is the instrument 50 ohms? Would RG8 introduce error? Owen -- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dead Serious T2FD: HV Insulation, EMP Arrestors, extra Coax Choke? | Antenna | |||
Non-radiating Feedlines? | Antenna | |||
Coax choke, losses and ferrite | Antenna | |||
Coax length - important ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |