Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 23:38:13 -0500, "J. Mc Laughlin"
wrote: I have dealt with approximations of the subject device. In each case, an extremely high input impedance amplifying device is placed at the base of the antenna that has a known voltage amplification and a 50 ohm output impedance. Knowing that a close approximation of the open circuit voltage is amplified by a known amount, a calibrated, tuned voltmeter (at 50 ohms) is able to measure the size of vertically polarized E (with the usual uncertainties). (and a bit of arithmetic) Hi Mac, I too, will jump in with alternatives to this short, thin rod feeding an infinite Z. It makes for a simple specification, but when the frequency begins to climb such is not very practical. Input Z's tend to be dominated with strays and that "short" rod begins to become enormous. Such artifacts of the MF era are quickly discarded. The NIST methods (NIST technical note numbers 1309 and 1098) employ resonant sized dipoles feeding a DC Hi R (and hence AC Hi Z load) at the gap of the elements. By DC Hi R, the detector filter employs 50KOhm components in a balanced cascading filter that in turn feeds a Hi R voltmeter through 250KOhm leads (carbon impregnated plastic conductors to decouple both loading and induction). Uncertainty, worst case, is 1dB. Schelkunoff's algorithm is used to find the length of the dipole (no real surprise here for halfwave length). The effective length is not half, but rather closer to 62 - 63%. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New program TRAP3.exe | Equipment | |||
Choke Baluns again. New program | Antenna | |||
FS: Visar Program Cable =>[ Ribs & Others Too ]<=== | Swap | |||
CW software decoder algorithm? | Homebrew |