Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The attenuation of a radio signal through water is staggeringly high
except at extremely low frequencies. Fresh water is lossy for two reasons: one is that the polar molecules attempt to align themselves with the oscillating electric field. This physical motion results in loss. The other is that "fresh" water generally has dissolved salts which increase its conductivity. Salt water's loss is dominated simply by its conductivity. Here are a few numbers for attenuation per meter. It's hard to find good data on loss in real fresh water, but I did locate a representative number for one frequency. F MHz Fresh water Salt water 0.01 3.9 dB 0.1 12 1 39 10 121 100 ~ 50 dB 369 Roy Lewallen, W7EL Asimov wrote: Hi, I was thinking about why radio wave communications are not generally used underwater. Basically I'm asking what are the quantitative components of the underwater medium that makes it impractical except for perhaps very short ranges. Things like attenuation, impedance, etc... Does any one here know these details or have them handy? A*s*i*m*o*v ... Acme Corp: Unlimited credit for disadvantaged coyotes. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Underwater Data Link? | General | |||
Longwave under water ??? | Shortwave |