Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owen Duffy wrote:
I really don't know why there is more TVI with a high swr. But my experience has been that there is, especially on 6 meters. If you can't explain the mechanism by which SWR causes TVI, perhaps they correlate by some other cause. For example, an antenna may develop loose oxided connections which both change the load impedance (and hence VSWR), and create intermodulation causing TVI. If VSWR *does* cause TVI, surely someone will be able to explain how? When people report "high SWR", they are usually talking about a coax-fed system, and they usually mean "a higher SWR than I expected for this antenna". That is a big clue that the antenna is not performing correctly... but the high SWR is only a symptom. It shouldn't be mistaken for a cause. One very common cause of RFI is common-mode RF current on the outside of the coax - in other words, the coax has become an unintended part of the antenna. The outside of the coax comes back down into the house, and can be a potent conductor of RFI. The higher than expected SWR is simply because the addition of the coax makes this a *different* antenna from the one you thought you were using. With something like a 6m yagi, the cure is generally to change to a truly balanced feed system, and to add a feedline choke. Obviously common-mode current is not the *only* possible connection between "high SWR" and RFI, but it's more common than many people suspect. Just caught Roy's second post about the mistaken belief that high SWR and feedline radiation. It should be clear from the above that higher-than-expected SWR and feedline radiation are two separate *results* of unwanted common-mode currents. Once again, SWR should not be mistaken for a cause. -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Sorry, the last paragraph of my previous posting should have included the word _causes_. It should have read: Just caught Roy's second post about the mistaken belief that high SWR _causes_ feedline radiation. It should be clear from the above that higher-than-expected SWR and feedline radiation are two separate *results* of unwanted common-mode currents. Once again, SWR should not be mistaken for a cause. -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Traveling Waves, Power Waves,..., Any Waves,... | Antenna | |||
Calculus not needed (was: Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit) | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |