Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Sorry, the last paragraph of my previous posting should have included the word _causes_. It should have read: Just caught Roy's second post about the mistaken belief that high SWR _causes_ feedline radiation. It should be clear from the above that higher-than-expected SWR and feedline radiation are two separate *results* of unwanted common-mode currents. Once again, SWR should not be mistaken for a cause. -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Traveling Waves, Power Waves,..., Any Waves,... | Antenna | |||
Calculus not needed (was: Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit) | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |