Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:34:33 -0500, Hal Rosser wrote:
"Allodoxaphobia" wrote in message ... On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 02:33:45 -0500, Hal Rosser wrote: "Charlie" wrote in message ... Currently the top loop is at only 20ft but I am making many contacts. Soon however they will be placed off a sidearm on the tower. The top loop could then be as high as 80 ft. I have read and read about this topic. Does anyone have any first hand knowledge of 6M height above ground comparisons especially for stacked loops? Thanks.... 6m is line-of-sight, so higher is better than lower. IT IS??? !!! Then, I guess my confirmed QSO's with Japan, Australia, Greenland, Chile, and others -- plus all states except R.I. (sigh...) from western Colorado (while running just 9.5 watts) simply never happened. OOPS! - sorry, I forgot about 50M DX - skip does happen at 50mhz sometimes Propagation to Japan, Australia, Greenland, Chile... ain't skip. It's F2 -- or Es-connected F2. Gets Real Crazy every 11 years or so. Does ducting also occur on 50 ? There's little that doesn't occur on 50 MHz. I have completed QSO's by Es, F2, Au, meteor, tropo ducting, and weird flavors and combinations of more than one of'em. Fellers also do EME on 6M - tho' not I. When the band is wide open on an Es opening -- maybe a 2X Es event -- you'll find the FB-OP-to-Jerk ratio Real High. It's one of the reasons I've all but given up on the 'popular' HF bands. And, to steer it back On Topic: Fiddl'in with antennas on 6M is SO EASY. 73 Jonesy -- Marvin L Jones | jonz | W3DHJ | linux Pueblo, Colorado | @ | Jonesy | OS/2 __ 38.24N 104.55W | config.com | DM78rf | SK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Cold Water Pipe Ground? | Antenna | |||
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | General | |||
Grounding Rod | Shortwave | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |