Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Bob wrote:
And to complicate matters further the max antenna height being talked about being around 3-4 wavelengths off the ground is going to break the radiation pattern up into a number of lobes at various vertical angles. For that reason alone I think it is still worth modelling. There will be specific heights where the horizontal radiated component is at a maximum and this is likely the most desirable. . . Modeling will show that at great distances from the antenna, the horizontally radiated field is zero from any horizontally polarized antenna over ground. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Cold Water Pipe Ground? | Antenna | |||
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | General | |||
Grounding Rod | Shortwave | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |