Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:53:21 -0800, Roy Lewallen
wrote: Bob Bob wrote: And to complicate matters further the max antenna height being talked about being around 3-4 wavelengths off the ground is going to break the radiation pattern up into a number of lobes at various vertical angles. For that reason alone I think it is still worth modelling. There will be specific heights where the horizontal radiated component is at a maximum and this is likely the most desirable. . . Modeling will show that at great distances from the antenna, the horizontally radiated field is zero from any horizontally polarized antenna over ground. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Please see http://www.cebik.com/vhf/ex6.html on the topic. Near the end of the article he gets into the horizonatally polarized less than 1WL interrupted loops typical of 6m (halos, squares and triangles). For more, he also has an article on HOHPLs (horizontally oriented horizontally polarized loops 1WL and greater). Worth reading and observing the models used. Allison Kb1GMX FN42HH |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Cold Water Pipe Ground? | Antenna | |||
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | General | |||
Grounding Rod | Shortwave | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |