Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I realize that dipoles are balanced antennas, but does the rig
itself still need an RF ground too? (I know the radio always needs a DC ground, of course). How about if the dipole is being used as a non-loaded "all band" antenna (IE: RIG--TRANSMATCH--LADDER LINE--DIPOLE) -- would this affect the need for an RF ground on the rig for operation in the dipole's non-resonant bands? Or is no RF ground _at all_ required with a dipole; unlike when using random wires or verticals, and other such un-balanced antennas? Thanks! Bill |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "billcalley" wrote in message oups.com... I realize that dipoles are balanced antennas, but does the rig itself still need an RF ground too? (I know the radio always needs a DC ground, of course). How about if the dipole is being used as a non-loaded "all band" antenna (IE: RIG--TRANSMATCH--LADDER LINE--DIPOLE) -- would this affect the need for an RF ground on the rig for operation in the dipole's non-resonant bands? Or is no RF ground _at all_ required with a dipole; unlike when using random wires or verticals, and other such un-balanced antennas? With ladder line it is best to use a balun between the antenna tuner and the transmission line. An RF ground on the rig is then not required (you won't have RF voltages on the rig's chassis). The thing about an RF ground is that due to the length of the ground circuit, the rig is often not grounded anyway. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
billcalley wrote:
I realize that dipoles are balanced antennas, but does the rig itself still need an RF ground too? If your feedline is balanced, that is it has equal and opposite currents on the two conductors, then there's no current left over to flow to or from ground and no need for an RF ground connection. All the current from one conductor goes back on the other. Feedlines can be balanced even if they're coax and/or the antenna is unsymmetrical; they can be unbalanced even if the antenna and feedline are symmetrical. If the feedline isn't balanced, the difference current (that is, the difference between the currents on the two feedline conductors) will find its way to ground however it can. This often creates undesirable effects. But if you can't avoid it, it's better to provide a low impedance path for the ground current if possible. And that can sometimes be difficult to do. (I know the radio always needs a DC ground, of course). No, it doesn't. It needs an AC safety ground if connected to the mains, and a lightning ground if that's a possible hazard. But DC isn't important. How about if the dipole is being used as a non-loaded "all band" antenna (IE: RIG--TRANSMATCH--LADDER LINE--DIPOLE) -- would this affect the need for an RF ground on the rig for operation in the dipole's non-resonant bands? Or is no RF ground _at all_ required with a dipole; unlike when using random wires or verticals, and other such un-balanced antennas? The trick is to get the feedline balanced on all bands. That requires either a truly balanced tuner, or a combination of a good balun and impedances on all bands at the balun which the balun can handle. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On 1 Jan 2006 12:47:43 -0800, "billcalley" wrote: Or is no RF ground _at all_ required with a dipole; unlike when using random wires or verticals, and other such un-balanced antennas? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Any antenna which requires a connection to ground should be shown the trash can immediately. Ground (earth) is a lousy conductor and does nothing to help your signal. RF belongs up in the air, not down in the dirt. If you find that connecting a ground wire actually improves your signal, you have a SERIOUS problem in your antenna. 73, Bill W6WRT |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Charles Schuler wrote:
"billcalley" wrote in message oups.com... I realize that dipoles are balanced antennas, but does the rig itself still need an RF ground too? (I know the radio always needs a DC ground, of course). How about if the dipole is being used as a non-loaded "all band" antenna (IE: RIG--TRANSMATCH--LADDER LINE--DIPOLE) -- would this affect the need for an RF ground on the rig for operation in the dipole's non-resonant bands? Or is no RF ground _at all_ required with a dipole; unlike when using random wires or verticals, and other such un-balanced antennas? With ladder line it is best to use a balun between the antenna tuner and the transmission line. An RF ground on the rig is then not required (you won't have RF voltages on the rig's chassis). The thing about an RF ground is that due to the length of the ground circuit, the rig is often not grounded anyway. Most modern shacks have to long distance between the rig and ground. It's not equal to an ungrounded rig but you might experience hf in your shack. This is best solved by a short ground cable to a proper ground rod. The next best thing is to buy or build an artificial ground. It's very simple and can be made to cover all ham bands easily and will always give you a perfect length of the earth cable... By cheating of course - but it works! Cheers M0DFI |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
billcalley wrote:
I realize that dipoles are balanced antennas, but does the rig itself still need an RF ground too? (I know the radio always needs a DC ground, of course). How about if the dipole is being used as a non-loaded "all band" antenna (IE: RIG--TRANSMATCH--LADDER LINE--DIPOLE) -- would this affect the need for an RF ground on the rig for operation in the dipole's non-resonant bands? Or is no RF ground _at all_ required with a dipole; unlike when using random wires or verticals, and other such un-balanced antennas? Thanks! Bill Get a virtual earth! They are easy to build for all ham bands! It's basically a phasing unit for the earth connection which can null the voltage on the earth at the RF Rig! Cheers M0DFI |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 00:12:21 +0000, Dan Andersson wrote: This is best solved by a short ground cable to a proper ground rod. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ No it isn't. It's best solved by keeping the RF out of the shack in the first place. Even if you could "ground" your RF, why would you want to run your RF through dirt? Is dirt a good antenna? 73, Bill W6WRT |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"billcalley" wrote in news:1136148463.132269.164130
@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: I realize that dipoles are balanced antennas, but does the rig itself still need an RF ground too? (I know the radio always needs a DC ground, of course). How about if the dipole is being used as a non-loaded "all band" antenna (IE: RIG--TRANSMATCH--LADDER LINE--DIPOLE) -- would this affect the need for an RF ground on the rig for operation in the dipole's non-resonant bands? Or is no RF ground _at all_ required with a dipole; unlike when using random wires or verticals, and other such un-balanced antennas? If the antenna is TRULY balanced and the feedline dressed well away from it at right angles you should have no common-mode currents on the feedline. That's the ideal case and in that ideal case you need no RF ground at the radio. The ideal case, however, rarely ever exists in practice. And end-fed wires can be a whole different ball game. I had to use a 16 foot counterpoise once to "ground" a rig in a 2nd story location when I end-fed a very long wire with it. -- Dave Oldridge+ ICQ 1800667 |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Thanks Guys -- I really appreciate the clarifications on grounding! It sometimes gets a bit confusing for me. Best Regards, Bill |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Oldridge wrote:
If the antenna is TRULY balanced and the feedline dressed well away from it at right angles you should have no common-mode currents on the feedline. . . . That only prevents one of the two ways common mode current can be created, by coupling. It can also be created by conduction. A common example is a coax-fed dipole, where the current in the outer feedline conductor splits between the antenna conductor and the outside of the coax. An equivalent problem can occur when a dipole is fed with symmetrical line such as ladder line, and one conductor of the line is connected to the rig's chassis at the rig end. The current on the inside of the chassis is equal to the current from the "hot" conductor, and this splits between the transmission line conductor and the outside of the chassis. A detailed explanation of conducted common mode current can be found at http://eznec.com/Amateur/Articles/Baluns.pdf. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|