Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dan Richardson wrote My link coupled tuner (Johnson Matchbox) cost me less than 60 USD, I can tuner faster than a T-type tuner, doesn't need nor use a balun. (Read one less component and its associated loss). So why would I want to replace it with something that works almost as good? Danny, K6MHE ========================================== Danny Boy, If you are happy with your link-coupled tuner, which can be either balanced or unbalanced, then by all means stick with it. I must admit it is something I forgot about. Many years back I had a similar commercial tuner. It didn't cover enough bands for me. So I dismantled it. The only parts worth recovering were the slow-motion variable capacitor drives and the nice skirted tuning knobs. Which I still have. They are of sentimental value. Ever since then I have used only home-brewed tuners with coils and capacitors connected with universal alligator clips. But never of the balanced variety. I wish you the very best of DX for 2006. ---- Reg, G4FGQ. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Balanced vs. Unbalanced Tuner | Antenna | |||
MFJ balanced line tuner efficiency? | Homebrew | |||
MFJ balanced line tuner efficiency? | Homebrew | |||
Balanced Tuner for Balanced Antennas? | Antenna | |||
Adjustment of simple balanced tuner | Antenna |