Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What??? Four 1/2 wavelength wires!! You gotta be kidding!!!
The Rhombic at AGA5HI in the early 70s was close to 6 wavelengths per side. There are/were two different rhombic designs. [Roy may want to comment on this.] A resonant rhombic without a termination resistor is bidirectional. A non resonant rhombic, a traveling wave design that uses a terminating resistor is unidirectional. Gain increases as the length of each side increases. Directivity [gain] is also dependent on the included angle which contributes to radiated beam width. AK Reg Edwards wrote: "Cecil Moore" wrote Reg Edwards wrote: A terminated rhombic is only 50 percent (or even less) efficient. But it's 50% in the bad direction, not the good direction. :-) =========================================== In the most simplistic of terms, a rhombic consists of four 1/2-wavelength wires plus a lossy resistor which gets hot. If the four 1/2-wavelength wires are rearranged to form a dipole, plus a reflector, plus two directors, we have only one good direction in which 100% of the power is radiated. Nothing gets hot. Common sense prevails. No need to refer to Eznec. Even a drunken old-wife would know which arrangement to choose, if only because it saves the cost and fitting of a high power, non-reactive resistor. ;o) But no doubt US Army Field Manuals still call upon rhombics. ---- Reg. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crystal Set Query | Shortwave | |||
Query IC-2350 | Swap | |||
Panasonic Query | Shortwave | |||
LU1ZA QSL Query | Dx | |||
LU1ZA QSL Query | Dx |