Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am assuming the reflection angle of 0j terminations would all be the same
(you said 180), this includes both resistive loads and an antenna at resonance. The method I am using relies on that. I am confused about one thing in the smith chart program. Cables identified as stubs create a circle that goes through infinity and do not exhibit a constant SWR, while simple cables create a constant SWR circle with the center and 50 Ohm 0j. I believe the setup I am testing exhibits the constant SWR characteristic. Dan Dan, if the load is resistive, and less than 50 ohms (assuming the center of the Smith Chart is considered to be 50 ohms), then the angle of the reflection coefficient is 180 degrees. If the load is resistive, and greater than 50 ohms, then the reflection coefficient angle is 0 degrees. As you approach the center of the Smith Chart the angle becomes less and less relevant. Shunt stubs - either open or shorted - always pass through "zero" (And infinity - which you will not see since it is in parallel with the load impedance) and the selected impedance on the Smith Chart. This is based on the effect that an open stub, at quarter wave multiples, will exhibit successive open and short circuits; as will a shorted stub. Your method will exhibit a constant reflection coefficient circle (and VSWR), with the angle varying from 180 degrees through zero degrees and then back, through negative angles, to 180 degrees. Frank |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
using an HP 8405A to measure SWR ? | Antenna | |||
measuring antenna resonance with an 8405a | Antenna |