| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard,
Thanks for your detailed answer. I am not really set upon combining. I am glad to run another wire. I gather from your response I am better off with the coax and two transformer setup than with using 300 ohm twin wire for the strictly AM radio purpose. Thanks, Eric "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:29:13 GMT, "Eric" wrote: 1. Can one antenna feed both tuners by being hooked up in parallell? Is there a signal loss? Hi Eric, Yes/Yes. Does the loss matter at a distance of 18 miles? Probably not. However, this question is rather hazy given the ones that follow seem to ask the same thing again. 2. Am I better off using 300 ohm flat TV type cable or should I use two 300/75 transformers (one at the reciever and one at the loop antenna) with RG-6 quad shield? I am wondering if the transformer loss is worth the possible noise reduction from the coax. Again, the presumption of loss is exaggerated. Your problem, as you describe it, is noise. However, the transformers are probably more suited for FM than AM. On further consideration, that may not matter either as it is the shielding action of the coax that may in fact offer more payback in noise reduction for the AM operation than any issue over the expected transformer loss. To take this one step further, at the AM antenna end of the coax, simply coil the coax around an empty liter coke bottle with a dozen or so turns. This is more to help isolate from noise than anything else. 3. Should I be able to use 1 loop for the two tuners and the coax, is it best to split the 75 ohm coax and use independent 300 ohm transformers or to split the 300 ohm feed from one tuner to the other? Another hazy question. Run separate lines for AM and FM. You can combine them, and split them out at each end so that there is only one long run of coax (which is commendable). However, as you are approaching this with a known problem, it is in your best interest to keep the bands/antennas/lines separate. 4. Is it possible to use the FM antenna for the AM and how would it be best to split that up? (I would have to feed two FM and two AM tuners but only two could be used at once). Another hazy question. Through all this haze, it seems you are quite set upon combining things. With such a wide separation in frequency, you would tend to end up with a single solution that poorly serves two purposes. It raises the complexity factor, and any problem compounds that further. This simply means that, yes, you can; but it would not seem likely you are actually doing yourself a favor. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:37:34 GMT, "Eric"
wrote: Richard, Thanks for your detailed answer. I am not really set upon combining. I am glad to run another wire. I gather from your response I am better off with the coax and two transformer setup than with using 300 ohm twin wire for the strictly AM radio purpose. Thanks, Hi Eric, Why you would use 300 Ohm twin wire for AM antennas is odd, but not prohibited. However, it does demand all the attention to keeping the line balanced (like I said, move away from coax, and problems become compounded). If there are 300 Ohm issues both at the antenna and at the radio, you must preserve them through transformers if you do migrate to coax. Balanced goes by many requirements, none of which can be ignored. An unbalanced condition is a tacit allowance for the intrusion of noise. As you describe a problem with noise - well, you see where this leads, an absolute exercise in driving out the imbalance. Where does it occur? How do you find it? The problems are stacking up already. It happens at the antenna itself when it is mounted near conductive materials. This observation only leads to more questions, what might be conductive that is nearby, and how near is nearby? The same problem exists with coax feeds, but you can solve those easier with the coiled lead at the end (you probably could do the same with twin lead - and winding either lead 4 or 5 times through a ferrite core could be equivalent fixes). However, this is only at the antenna end, and that may not be the source of the imbalance. For twin leads, it could be as easily that the lead traces up against metal ducting, or along house wiring. If you are scrupulous about these kind of details, twin lead may indeed work fine. Another method of tackling the problem is to carry a small transistor radio around the house, and try to locate the noise itself. Killing the source is a one pound cure for a ten pound problem. If the noise comes from outside the house, then you have antenna issues, and all the wishing in the world in trying to avoid a different antenna will come to naught. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] | Shortwave | |||
| Antenna Advice | Shortwave | |||
| Question for better antenna mavens than I | Shortwave | |||
| Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod | Scanner | |||
| Outdoor Scanner antenna and eventually a reference to SW reception | Shortwave | |||