Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 16:44:04 GMT, "
wrote: hmmm, this stuff I have read on NVIS says 0.1 to 0.2 wavelengths. I can find the source if anyone is interested (I am not at home right now). I am certainly not arguing (I have no problem arguing, but this is one of many subjects about which I have very little knowledge), Richard, just mentioning a difference in what I have read. Paul AB0SI Hi Paul, The troops, during Desert Storm, achieved NVIS by laying the antenna on the ground. I will add, that like Richard points out, it was sand. Logic would suggest that an antenna very close to ground has no chance of launching much energy tangential to the earth's surface (a direct short), leaving what's left to go straight up and hazard a bounce from above. If you raise that antenna to a quarter wave up, you simply optimize the straight up radiation, but you also lose a lot of the immediate ground loss that snubbed the tangential angles. What few dipole users would admit (because they love to crow about not having radials) is that if you add radials, you can further improve your dipole performance up AND tangentially. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Are fractal antennas being used in cellphones? | Antenna |