Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
Old December 11th 03, 03:17 AM
Ralph Mowery
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...
Zo of ALL real, ordinary, transmission lines changes versus frequency over

a
very wide frequency range.

Zo ranges over lots of thousands of ohms at a few cyles of seconds,
thousands of ohms at power frequencies, hundreds of ohms at audio
frequencies, and from tens to a few hundred ohms from 100KHz up to as many
GHz as you like.
---
Reg.



Are we talking the same thing for Zo ? That a piece of say rg-8 ( whatever
they want to call it now) that is 50 ohm coax is not 50 ohms over its normal
operating frequency range ?


  #22   Report Post  
Old December 11th 03, 11:56 AM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
Zo of ALL real, ordinary, transmission lines changes versus frequency

over
a
very wide frequency range.

Zo ranges over lots of thousands of ohms at a few cyles of seconds,
thousands of ohms at power frequencies, hundreds of ohms at audio
frequencies, and from tens to a few hundred ohms from 100KHz up to as

many
GHz as you like.
---
Reg.



Are we talking the same thing for Zo ? That a piece of say rg-8 (

whatever
they want to call it now) that is 50 ohm coax is not 50 ohms over its

normal
operating frequency range ?

=============================

What is your normal operating frequency range?

Here is Zo typical of cable similar to RG-58 versus frequency.

Nominal Zo = 50 ohms.
Degrees = Angle of Zo.

Freq Zo Degrees
------ ------- -------
10 Hz 3000 -45.0
100 Hz 950 -44.9
1000 Hz 301 -44.1
10 KHz 97 -36.4
100 KHz 54.2 -10.1
1 MHz 50.0 -2.6
10 MHz 48.4 -0.84
100 MHz 48.0 -0.26
1 GHz 47.8 -0.08

Superimposed on the above Zo vs F characteristics are manufacturing
reel-to-reel variations of 2 or 3 percent.
----
Reg, G4FGQ


  #23   Report Post  
Old December 11th 03, 03:14 PM
JDer8745
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Someone sed about the characteristic frequency of a transmission line::

"It does not change at any reasonable frequency for the line. That is at
least anything below 1 ghz for coax."

The formula for Zo contains the frequency.

Look it up.

73 de Jack K9CUN
  #24   Report Post  
Old December 11th 03, 03:17 PM
JDer8745
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Someone sed:

" Do you know of anyone that has an infinite length of transmission line? Or
an infinite anything? :-)."

===============

Some of these threads are PRETTY LONG, approaching infinity???

73 de Jack, K9CUN
  #25   Report Post  
Old December 11th 03, 03:29 PM
JDer8745
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Someone sed:

"So, the 300/75/50 ohm term, characteristic impedance, is the square root of
L/C"

This is an *approximation* that is useful when complex arithmetic is over the
capability of your calculator or if the imaginary components of the formula for
Zo are negligible.

At the usual HF through UHF ham frequencies the imaginary components are
negligible so the approximation suffices.

UNITS: 10-pF capacitor. 10-pF is hypenated when used as a modifier, i. e.,
adjective.

Others: 10-ft pole, 5-cent cigar, 2-dollar pistol, 12-V battery, 500-mile
track.

73 de Jack, K9CUN


  #26   Report Post  
Old December 11th 03, 06:10 PM
Gene Fuller
 
Posts: n/a
Default

JDer8745 wrote:

snip


UNITS: 10-pF capacitor. 10-pF is hypenated when used as a modifier, i. e.,
adjective.

Others: 10-ft pole, 5-cent cigar, 2-dollar pistol, 12-V battery, 500-mile
track.

73 de Jack, K9CUN



Partly correct.

The use of "10-picofarad capacitor" is preferred under the standard rules of
English and the NIST style guide. The use of "10-pF capacitor" should be
replaced by "10 pF capacitor" according to NIST.

See section 7.2 in http://www.physics.nist.gov/Pubs/SP811/contents.html

"Even when the value of a quantity is used in an adjectival sense, a space is
left between the numerical value and the unit symbol. (This rule recognizes that
unit symbols are not like ordinary words or abbreviations but are mathematical
entities, and that the value of a quantity should be expressed in a way that is
as independent of language as possible.)"

"When unit names are spelled out, the normal rules of English apply. Thus, for
example, ‘a roll of 35-millimeter film’ is acceptable."

73,
Gene
W4SZ

  #27   Report Post  
Old December 11th 03, 09:56 PM
w4jle
 
Posts: n/a
Default

When putting up an antenna, do you use different Zo coax for 2 Vs. 80 meters
to account for frequency change?

The Zo is constant for all practical purposes below Giga Hz freqs.

"JDer8745" wrote in message
...
Someone sed,

"Reg, G4FGQ observed on these pages long ago that an ordinary ohmmeter

would
read Zo if connected to the end of an infinite line. He is right of

course."

But the Zo of a line varies with frequency. How will the "ordinary

ohmmeter"
do the job at, say, 100 kHz?

73 de jack



  #28   Report Post  
Old December 11th 03, 10:02 PM
w4jle
 
Posts: n/a
Default

As most of us do not transmit in the audio range, your own data shows a
range of 50 to 47.8 Ohms for normal ham use. Close enough for government
work, at least as far as I am concerned..

"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...

"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
Zo of ALL real, ordinary, transmission lines changes versus frequency

over
a
very wide frequency range.

Zo ranges over lots of thousands of ohms at a few cyles of seconds,
thousands of ohms at power frequencies, hundreds of ohms at audio
frequencies, and from tens to a few hundred ohms from 100KHz up to as

many
GHz as you like.
---
Reg.



Are we talking the same thing for Zo ? That a piece of say rg-8 (

whatever
they want to call it now) that is 50 ohm coax is not 50 ohms over its

normal
operating frequency range ?

=============================

What is your normal operating frequency range?

Here is Zo typical of cable similar to RG-58 versus frequency.

Nominal Zo = 50 ohms.
Degrees = Angle of Zo.

Freq Zo Degrees
------ ------- -------
10 Hz 3000 -45.0
100 Hz 950 -44.9
1000 Hz 301 -44.1
10 KHz 97 -36.4
100 KHz 54.2 -10.1
1 MHz 50.0 -2.6
10 MHz 48.4 -0.84
100 MHz 48.0 -0.26
1 GHz 47.8 -0.08

Superimposed on the above Zo vs F characteristics are manufacturing
reel-to-reel variations of 2 or 3 percent.
----
Reg, G4FGQ




  #29   Report Post  
Old December 11th 03, 10:05 PM
w4jle
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jack, with all due respect, you need a hobby...


"JDer8745" wrote in message
...
Someone sed:

"So, the 300/75/50 ohm term, characteristic impedance, is the square root

of
L/C"

This is an *approximation* that is useful when complex arithmetic is over

the
capability of your calculator or if the imaginary components of the

formula for
Zo are negligible.

At the usual HF through UHF ham frequencies the imaginary components are
negligible so the approximation suffices.

UNITS: 10-pF capacitor. 10-pF is hypenated when used as a modifier, i.

e.,
adjective.

Others: 10-ft pole, 5-cent cigar, 2-dollar pistol, 12-V battery, 500-mile
track.

73 de Jack, K9CUN



  #30   Report Post  
Old December 11th 03, 10:38 PM
Ralph Mowery
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
Zo of ALL real, ordinary, transmission lines changes versus frequency

over
a
very wide frequency range.

Zo ranges over lots of thousands of ohms at a few cyles of seconds,
thousands of ohms at power frequencies, hundreds of ohms at audio
frequencies, and from tens to a few hundred ohms from 100KHz up to as

many
GHz as you like.
---
Reg.



Are we talking the same thing for Zo ? That a piece of say rg-8 (

whatever
they want to call it now) that is 50 ohm coax is not 50 ohms over its

normal
operating frequency range ?

=============================

What is your normal operating frequency range?

Here is Zo typical of cable similar to RG-58 versus frequency.

Nominal Zo = 50 ohms.
Degrees = Angle of Zo.

Freq Zo Degrees
------ ------- -------
10 Hz 3000 -45.0
100 Hz 950 -44.9
1000 Hz 301 -44.1
10 KHz 97 -36.4
100 KHz 54.2 -10.1
1 MHz 50.0 -2.6
10 MHz 48.4 -0.84
100 MHz 48.0 -0.26
1 GHz 47.8 -0.08

Superimposed on the above Zo vs F characteristics are manufacturing
reel-to-reel variations of 2 or 3 percent.
----
Reg, G4FGQ


Think I must have missed the point about REAL transmission lines. Trying to
keep up with too many discussions at one time. I was thinking of the simple
formular where frequency is not mentioned. I do know about the problem of
making the coax exectally the same all the time where even in the same reel
of coax you can get into suckout problems due to slight variations in the
coax.




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
Ladder Line or Coax For Reception only? Walter Antenna 12 October 11th 03 03:16 AM
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? Dr. Slick Antenna 140 August 18th 03 08:17 PM
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? Dr. Slick Antenna 255 July 29th 03 11:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017