Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 9th 03, 11:23 PM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"VHFRadioBuff" wrote in message
...
I think most would assume he meant for similarly sized cables.


Since I don't know the physical differences between RG-8, RG-8U, RG-8X and
RG-213, I wouldn't know that he meant similarly sized cables.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
73! de Andy KC2SSB - WPYI880 (GMRS)
Beachwood, NJ USA! Grid FM29vw
http://vhfradiobuff.tripod.com


This is what I like about Andy...VHF Radio goof. He knows nothing but that
don't stop him from giving his 'advise'.

A MAJOR factor for using 213 is it is Mil-spec.

And it sure isn't new cable.

Dan/W4NTI


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017