Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK, I'm a little confused. Well, maybe more than a little.
Starting with energy as the "ability to do work" and power as the rate at which energy is "transformed" into work, things quickly get muddy. Energy passing through an imaginary surface (or point or plane) would not actually do any work in passing through, and in fact would retain its full potential to do work after having passed through. What then is power density? Is it the amount of work that the energy passing through a unit area of the surface "could have done" had it been actually and fully "captured" at that surface? There is no real power at that surface, is there? While power (and work) absolutely require energy, it strikes me as metaphysical whether all energy ultimately does do work and produce power. I don't think physics requires that, and it seems that lot of radiated energy is not obviously being transformed into work. So is energy without power really impossible, Cecil? Been away from this for a longer bit than I'm comfortable mentioning. Chuck. NT3G Cecil Moore wrote: chuck wrote: Technically, is it not energy that leaves the transmitter and is received by the receiver? Technically, RF energy passing a point/plane during a unit of time is RF power (joules/sec). We can't have one without the other. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question Pool vs Book Larnin' | Policy | |||
stuff for all hams | General | |||
N3CVJ talking about children again.. | CB | |||
Question for the No coders : post from Kim | Policy | |||
Question for Roy Lewallen | Antenna |