Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the differences in this discussion go back to very fundamental
definitions of power and energy (and power flux, which might not be the same as power). One set of terminology came from classical Thermodynamics and the other set from more general principles. More fun may be had dealing with the Second Law (which arrived from two very different viewpoints) and, for example, quantum effects in the same discussion. The discussion can quickly hinge on precise meanings of common words, such as "power." Mixing terminology produces such wonderful concepts as measuring 100 watts flowing at 100 points in a transmission line and concluding that we have found 10,000 watts. Bill W2WO |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question Pool vs Book Larnin' | Policy | |||
stuff for all hams | General | |||
N3CVJ talking about children again.. | CB | |||
Question for the No coders : post from Kim | Policy | |||
Question for Roy Lewallen | Antenna |