Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan, even more questions: I don't understand the relationship of radial
length to height. c_poise seems to allow anything. What is the "H" of a loading coil? Frank "dansawyeror" wrote in message ... Follow up: One of the not so apparent results of Reg's program is the relationship of radial length to height. I chose 2 meters because they were only .7 meters high. I raised your model to 2 meters, that reduced the R to about 20 Ohms. Raising it to 3 meters lowers it to 18 Ohms. How did you calculate the H of the loading coils? Is that easy to edit? It would seem that these values are closer. Dan Frank's Basement 2 wrote: Hi Dan, thanks for the interesting info. You did not specify dimensions, but from your comments it appears you are using a vertical about 23 ft high. Such a monopole would have a 3.5 ohm input impedance when placed above a perfectly conducting ground, and gain about +4.5 dBi. Adding a center loading coil raises the input impedance to 11.5 ohms, and gain +2.6 dBi. Base loading provides an input impedance of 5.5 ohms with almost the same gain as center loading (Q = 400). Adding ten, 6ft radials, at 3" above an average ground, the input impedance increases to 40 ohms, and gain -6.3 dBi. Adding lumped element loading coils, (75 uH, Q = 400) in each radial (antenna base end) drops the input impedance to 37 ohms, and gain -6.4 dBi. Don't know why this does not agree with Reg's program. Probably I made some fundamental error with the NEC model. Included the code below, so you may see an error I missed. 73, Frank CM 75 m Vertical 23 ft high CE GW 1 64 0 0 23 0 0 0.25 0.0026706 GW 2 12 0 0 0.25 6 0 0.25 0.0026706 GM 1 9 0 0 36 0 0 0 002.002 GS 0 0 .3048 GE 1 GN 2 0 0 0 13.0000 0.0050 EX 0 1 64 0 1.00000 0.00000 LD 5 1 1 184 5.8001E7 LD 4 1 33 33 4 1600 LD 4 2 1 1 4 1750 LD 4 3 1 1 4 1750 LD 4 4 1 1 4 1750 LD 4 5 1 1 4 1750 LD 4 6 1 1 4 1750 LD 4 7 1 1 4 1750 LD 4 8 1 1 4 1750 LD 4 9 1 1 4 1750 LD 4 10 1 1 4 1750 LD 4 11 1 1 4 1750 FR 0 11 0 0 3.5 0.05 RP 0 181 1 1000 -90 0 1.00000 1.00000 EN Frank, Good morning. Let me start at the beginning. I have a loaded vertical on 75 meters. The combination of the antenna and ground measure about 40 Ohms at the antenna. The models all show such an antenna over a perfect ground should have a radiation resistance of between 3 and 4 Ohms. That says the antenna system is less the 10% efficient. This then is a journey to reduce ground resistance. Attempts to add radials and wire mesh to the ground have had very little if no effect. This leads to Reg's c_poise model. It predicts a coil in the range of 60 uH to 90 uH tuned to a 2 meter by 18 mm 'wire' will have a total resistance in the 2 to 4 Ohms range. Together this should result is a 8 Ohm system. The ratio can be directly inferred as an performance improvement of 5 to 1 or 7 db. This is worth some effort. To answer your question the first step will be one coil and one radial. The objective is the get the antenna system close to 10 Ohms. From there I will experiment with adding radials and coils. I am not sure what to expect. Thanks - Dan Frank wrote: Not sure I understand what is going on Dan. Are you planning on loading each radial element? Frank "dansawyeror" wrote in message ... These results were from Reg's c_poise program. The band is 75 meters and the coils were about 70 uH. The coils were a relatively large diameter, on the order of a meter. The wire lengths were about 20 meters. By varying the length the coil, the coil wire may be varies from 1mm to 12mm. Richard Clark wrote: On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 08:20:38 -0800, dansawyeror wrote: The devil is in the details. Modeling shows large coils with 1 mm wire have a Q in the range of a few hundred. On the other hand a coil with 12 mm tubing has a Q of about 2000. The R of the 1 mm coil is about 6 Ohms while the 12 mm coil is on the order of 1 Ohm. Given these model results it says there is a significant difference between 1 mm and 12 mm coils. Hi Dan, In the details, indeed. What is the LENGTH of wire in this 6 Ohm resistor? What is the LENGTH of wire in this 1 Ohm resistor? How many turns are in these "large coils?" What is their diameter? What is their solenoid length? Without these details, there is nothing said that is significant. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I missed this one. About 96 uH.
Frank's Basement 2 wrote: Dan, even more questions: I don't understand the relationship of radial length to height. c_poise seems to allow anything. What is the "H" of a loading coil? Frank "dansawyeror" wrote in message ... Follow up: One of the not so apparent results of Reg's program is the relationship of radial length to height. I chose 2 meters because they were only .7 meters high. I raised your model to 2 meters, that reduced the R to about 20 Ohms. Raising it to 3 meters lowers it to 18 Ohms. How did you calculate the H of the loading coils? Is that easy to edit? It would seem that these values are closer. Dan Frank's Basement 2 wrote: Hi Dan, thanks for the interesting info. You did not specify dimensions, but from your comments it appears you are using a vertical about 23 ft high. Such a monopole would have a 3.5 ohm input impedance when placed above a perfectly conducting ground, and gain about +4.5 dBi. Adding a center loading coil raises the input impedance to 11.5 ohms, and gain +2.6 dBi. Base loading provides an input impedance of 5.5 ohms with almost the same gain as center loading (Q = 400). Adding ten, 6ft radials, at 3" above an average ground, the input impedance increases to 40 ohms, and gain -6.3 dBi. Adding lumped element loading coils, (75 uH, Q = 400) in each radial (antenna base end) drops the input impedance to 37 ohms, and gain -6.4 dBi. Don't know why this does not agree with Reg's program. Probably I made some fundamental error with the NEC model. Included the code below, so you may see an error I missed. 73, Frank CM 75 m Vertical 23 ft high CE GW 1 64 0 0 23 0 0 0.25 0.0026706 GW 2 12 0 0 0.25 6 0 0.25 0.0026706 GM 1 9 0 0 36 0 0 0 002.002 GS 0 0 .3048 GE 1 GN 2 0 0 0 13.0000 0.0050 EX 0 1 64 0 1.00000 0.00000 LD 5 1 1 184 5.8001E7 LD 4 1 33 33 4 1600 LD 4 2 1 1 4 1750 LD 4 3 1 1 4 1750 LD 4 4 1 1 4 1750 LD 4 5 1 1 4 1750 LD 4 6 1 1 4 1750 LD 4 7 1 1 4 1750 LD 4 8 1 1 4 1750 LD 4 9 1 1 4 1750 LD 4 10 1 1 4 1750 LD 4 11 1 1 4 1750 FR 0 11 0 0 3.5 0.05 RP 0 181 1 1000 -90 0 1.00000 1.00000 EN Frank, Good morning. Let me start at the beginning. I have a loaded vertical on 75 meters. The combination of the antenna and ground measure about 40 Ohms at the antenna. The models all show such an antenna over a perfect ground should have a radiation resistance of between 3 and 4 Ohms. That says the antenna system is less the 10% efficient. This then is a journey to reduce ground resistance. Attempts to add radials and wire mesh to the ground have had very little if no effect. This leads to Reg's c_poise model. It predicts a coil in the range of 60 uH to 90 uH tuned to a 2 meter by 18 mm 'wire' will have a total resistance in the 2 to 4 Ohms range. Together this should result is a 8 Ohm system. The ratio can be directly inferred as an performance improvement of 5 to 1 or 7 db. This is worth some effort. To answer your question the first step will be one coil and one radial. The objective is the get the antenna system close to 10 Ohms. From there I will experiment with adding radials and coils. I am not sure what to expect. Thanks - Dan Frank wrote: Not sure I understand what is going on Dan. Are you planning on loading each radial element? Frank "dansawyeror" wrote in message ... These results were from Reg's c_poise program. The band is 75 meters and the coils were about 70 uH. The coils were a relatively large diameter, on the order of a meter. The wire lengths were about 20 meters. By varying the length the coil, the coil wire may be varies from 1mm to 12mm. Richard Clark wrote: On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 08:20:38 -0800, dansawyeror wrote: The devil is in the details. Modeling shows large coils with 1 mm wire have a Q in the range of a few hundred. On the other hand a coil with 12 mm tubing has a Q of about 2000. The R of the 1 mm coil is about 6 Ohms while the 12 mm coil is on the order of 1 Ohm. Given these model results it says there is a significant difference between 1 mm and 12 mm coils. Hi Dan, In the details, indeed. What is the LENGTH of wire in this 6 Ohm resistor? What is the LENGTH of wire in this 1 Ohm resistor? How many turns are in these "large coils?" What is their diameter? What is their solenoid length? Without these details, there is nothing said that is significant. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Info - Icom IC-R75 with Kiwa Mods and Antenna Supermarket Eavesdropper SWL Sloper | Shortwave | |||
Loading Coil Q | Antenna | |||
Current in loading coil, EZNEC - helix | Antenna | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Shortwave |