Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Damien,
It's a fairly common practice, if you have a remote tuner handy. How well it will work depends a lot on the tuner, if it can handle the impedances presented to it. Not having a remote tuner, I do about the same thing except the coax run is very short and the parallel feed line is very long (lol). Are there any 'problems' with doing it this way (or your way)? Sure, the same ones you see in almost any antenna installation. There are frequencies where the RFI is more objectionable than others. What those frequencies are is going to be different for every installation / situation, so you'll just have to try it and see. Good luck... 'Doc |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for all the good info. gents.
Actually 80m is not critical for me. I was really looking for something that will work nicely on 40 - 10m (including WARC would be nice), and have been looking over the 44' design on the W4RNL page http://www.cebik.com/aledz.html The plan was to mount an SGC tuner or similar under the eaves near the antenna and run coax back through the roof, because running open wire feeder just isn't practical in the physical situation. I run 250w PEP SSB, but it would also be nice if the system could handle 120w of AM because I'm into that as well. Unfortunately that means one of the high power tuners. I have tried a Carolina Windom (40m "Beam" version") here, but while it works well on 40m it gets progressively deaf above that. H'm.... all food for thought. Damien VK3RX |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Open wire feedline is an excellent alternative and is much lower loss than
coax, especially at high SWRs. This way you can use a tuner in the shack. 73s, Evan |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Website recommendations | Antenna | |||
remote sensing--- need schematics to build | Antenna | |||
recommendations on non-crank-up self-supporting towers | Antenna |