Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Dear Mr. Cecil Moore,
I am terribly sorry but I am not so sure that I am in position to follow your argument, except perhaps that the equation | ... | |b1|^2 = |s11*a1|^2 + |s12*a2|^2 + 2*s11*a1*s12*a2 | ... needs a modification to the third term on its right hand side, in which, instead of 2*s11*a1*s12*a2 we have to set 2*Re{[s11*a1]*Conjg[s12*a2]} Therefore, I can only guess that this subtle distinction is the source of the trouble because this is maybe due to the sure existence of two, after Kurokawa, different physical meanings for the same physical phenomenon. And finally, unfortunately enough, it seems that there are maybe more than a finite number of possible such physical meanings for the same physical phenomenon... Sincerely yours, pez SV7BAX TheDAG |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Complex Z0 [Corrected] | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna |