LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Report Post  
Old December 12th 03, 05:53 PM
pez
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dear Mr. Cecil Moore,

I am terribly sorry but
I am not so sure that
I am in position to follow your argument,
except perhaps that
the equation

| ...
| |b1|^2 = |s11*a1|^2 + |s12*a2|^2 + 2*s11*a1*s12*a2
| ...

needs a modification to
the third term on its right hand side,
in which,
instead of

2*s11*a1*s12*a2

we have to set

2*Re{[s11*a1]*Conjg[s12*a2]}

Therefore,
I can only guess that
this subtle distinction is the source of the trouble
because this is maybe due to
the sure existence of two,
after Kurokawa,
different physical meanings
for the same physical phenomenon.

And finally,
unfortunately enough,
it seems that there are
maybe more than a finite number
of possible such physical meanings
for the same physical phenomenon...

Sincerely yours,

pez
SV7BAX
TheDAG





 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) Dr. Slick Antenna 199 September 12th 03 10:06 PM
Complex Z0 [Corrected] pez Antenna 41 September 11th 03 05:00 PM
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? Dr. Slick Antenna 104 September 6th 03 02:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017