| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear Mr. Cecil Moore,
I think now I understand the notation. If | ... | a1*a2 is phasor multiplication, a1*a2*cos(theta) | ... then s11*a1*s12*a2 is s11*a1*s12*a2*cos(phi) which has the same meaning as the Re{[s11*a1]*Conjg[s12*a2]} and the only thing which remains is the specification of the phi range of values. I think also, I grasped your point of view for the existence of a deeper, common, base between these different physical phenomena, with which anyone hardly disagrees. Finally, I would ask you to tell me please, the reference details to Dr. Best's QEX article and Hecht's _Optics_. Thanking you in advance, pez SV7BAX TheDAG |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
| Complex Z0 [Corrected] | Antenna | |||
| Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||