LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Report Post  
Old December 12th 03, 10:17 PM
pez
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dear Mr. Cecil Moore,

I think now I understand the notation.
If

| ...
| a1*a2 is phasor multiplication, a1*a2*cos(theta)
| ...

then s11*a1*s12*a2
is s11*a1*s12*a2*cos(phi)

which has the same meaning as the

Re{[s11*a1]*Conjg[s12*a2]}

and the only thing which remains
is the specification of the phi range of values.

I think also,
I grasped your point of view
for the existence of a deeper, common, base between
these different physical phenomena,
with which anyone hardly disagrees.

Finally,
I would ask you to tell me please,
the reference details to
Dr. Best's QEX article and Hecht's _Optics_.

Thanking you in advance,

pez
SV7BAX
TheDAG



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) Dr. Slick Antenna 199 September 12th 03 10:06 PM
Complex Z0 [Corrected] pez Antenna 41 September 11th 03 05:00 PM
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? Dr. Slick Antenna 104 September 6th 03 02:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017