Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Mr. Cecil Moore,
I think now I understand the notation. If | ... | a1*a2 is phasor multiplication, a1*a2*cos(theta) | ... then s11*a1*s12*a2 is s11*a1*s12*a2*cos(phi) which has the same meaning as the Re{[s11*a1]*Conjg[s12*a2]} and the only thing which remains is the specification of the phi range of values. I think also, I grasped your point of view for the existence of a deeper, common, base between these different physical phenomena, with which anyone hardly disagrees. Finally, I would ask you to tell me please, the reference details to Dr. Best's QEX article and Hecht's _Optics_. Thanking you in advance, pez SV7BAX TheDAG |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Complex Z0 [Corrected] | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna |