Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote:
Larry Benko wrote: Roy, It is amazing how a simple concept such as impedance can be made obscure but most current probes are spec'd this way by the manufacturers and test procedures for DO-160E (FAA aircraft testing) call out probes the same way. By saying that a current probe has a transfer impedance of 0dB-ohm means 0dB relative to 1 ohm, but R = V/I so 0dB-ohm means that for 1A of current thru the primary of the probe produces 1V across a 50 ohm load. Similarly a -20db-ohm transfer means that 1A produces .1V across a 50 ohm load. For most of us, this means a 1 turn primary and a 50 turn secondary which yields a theoretical primary impedance or 0.02 ohms. One of the probes I have says the primary impedance is less than .1 ohm. Larry Benko, W0QE Thanks for the explanation. My concern is with the insertion impedance, which at 0.02 or even 0.1 ohm, is certainly adequately low for this device -- as long as it's properly terminated. Roy Lewallen, W7EL That's why these probes which are about the size of a small donut cost over $1000. Since they are used to qualify EMI emissions from other equipment they are priced like test equipment and certified to be accurate. Generally the frequency response if terminated properly is flat to within a fraction of a dB. Occasionally they show up on eBay and usually go for less than $100. With no parts to wear out they never go bad unless they have been used to test equipment for EMI susceptability where you transmit RF into them, sometimes at high power levels. Larry, W0QE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Power radiated from feedlines | Antenna | |||
SWR - wtf? | CB | |||
SWR - wtf? | Antenna | |||
swr question | Antenna | |||
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Shortwave |