Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frank's" wrote in message news:3z0Mf.1838$dg.1085@clgrps13... "John, N9JG" wrote in message news:ij%Lf.797528$_o.574035@attbi_s71... Most people put the series tuning capacitor in the top side and the feed point at the bottom side. Since the capacitor, motor, and their mounting hardware is quite heavy, I am currently planning to do the reverse of the above, i.e., tuning capacitor at bottom and feed point at the top. It is not clear to me if there is any difference between these two configurations. John, N9JG I have not attempted to model the gamma match, but doubt it will change the current distribution. Feeding at the top places the minimum current at the loop base which seems to effect the high angle radiation only. The gain straight up is about + 2 dBi, and -3 dBi when reversed. Low angle radiation, for example at 10 deg elevation, is - 3 dBi in both cases. Removing the capacitor totally reverses the current distribution. Maximum gain occurs parallel to the loop plane. Frank, VE6CB Also top feed increases the input impedance to 2.664 - j0.949, with the capacitive load 0.1 -j858 at 3.75 MHz. (NEC 4.1 double precision). |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | Broadcasting | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | CB | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | General |