| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Richard Harrison" wrote On page 99 of Terman`s 1955 edition of "Electronic and Radio Engineering" (my textbook was an earlier edition) is found the formula to convert the reflection coefficient into SWR or vice versa. These two parameters are innexorably locked together by formulas (4-22a) and (4-22b). ============================================= Richard, I'm afraid your worship of Terman has let you down. The two parameters are NOT inexorably locked together. SWR can be calculated from the Reflection Coefficient. But half of the information is then lost and gone for ever. And so, NOT vice-versa! --- Reg. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear Richard,
You must have a very extensive library. By the way, it is NOT Terman or his books which I disdain. It is the TREATMENT, by his readers, of his books as Bibles which I disdain. The situation is on a par with the more modern, unjustifyable, absolute confidence placed in computer programs and pocket calculators by their users. Computer programs have authors. How much confidence can be placed in THEM is what matters. Amongst my exceedingly small collection of books is one of Terman's. It was printed during WW2. I bought it, second hand, just after the war. 60 years back I learned, critically, a lot from it. Nowadays I refer to it every few months when searching for something about which to write another computer program. So the book is still quite valuable as a comprehensible collection of topics. I have nothing from Kraus. I know of him only from the frequency at which he is referred to by bible worshippers on this newsgroup. I have read about B,L & E. They are the famous trio who left the site without bothering to measure ground resistivity. Their boss should have sent them back. Who was HE? He must have known what they were up to less than THEY did. Being a WW2 veteran I'm pleased to meet you. The experience, like mine, was educational. And I'm sure you have a sense of humour similar to mine. ;o) ---- Regards, Reg, G4FGQ. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reg Edwards wrote:
I have nothing from Kraus. I know of him only from the frequency at which he is referred to by bible worshippers on this newsgroup. Reg, for anyone who is interested, "Antennas for All Applications", 3rd edition, by Kraus and Marhefka, ISBN 0-07-232103-2, is available "new" or "as new" from the following source for $30. It would be nice if everyone on this newsgroup would spring for one. It comes close to being the best $30 that I ever spent on a book. http://www.abebooks.com/ http://dogbert.abebooks.com/servlet/...072321032&x=54 -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:58:03 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote: I have read about B,L & E. They are the famous trio who left the site without bothering to measure ground resistivity. This is the makings of Victorian Melodrama, because they also did not measu the altitude; the humidity; the phase of the moon; the date of the Paschal moon; the height of the tide in Tasmania; the frequency of eruptions from Mt. Etna; the red shift emitted from the star Betelgeuse. Of course, Reggie, I will leave you with the last half dozen responses to flesh out this list. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Richard Harrison" wrote There really is no need to rename the ubiquituos SWR meter as Reg has recommended. This really requires no comment as it isn`t about to happen. ========================================= Richard, Maybe you are right about no need to rename the SWR meter. It does indeed indicate SWR when located at the correct place in the system, it is correctly calibrated impedance-wise, and there is a line on which it can be assumed an SWR exists. But where the thing is located in 99.9 percent of occasions it indicates nonsense. Where SWR on the antenna's feedline is concerned it is totally misleading to novices, CB-ers, amateurs and professionals alike. Hardly educational! I have noticed a few references to TLI are beginning to appear. All that's needed is a sensible Japanese, Chinese or Korean transceiver manufacturer to face the facts and refer to TLI in an operating or maintenance manual. I know its sometimes difficult to learn a new word in a new way of thinking but force yourself to comply with the obvious! It's much easier than having to change to the Metric System. The same economies apply. ---- Reg, G4FGQ. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have just had several glasses of Australian Zonte's Footstep wine.
I can recommend it. Its name can be traced back to a marsupial which replaced the dinosaurs. ............. Maybe so, but the name gives me the image of a bunch of VK's stomping around on a bunch of grapes with their bare feet. Just hoped they washed them first... "the feet, more importantly than the grapes" :/ MK |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| RF filters and Impedance Matching | Homebrew | |||
| Calculus not needed (was: Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit) | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
| The two sorts of loss | Antenna | |||