| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Owen Duffy wrote:
"Richard, formula 4-22b calculates the magnitude of the reflection coefficient from SWR, it is not possible to calculate the reflection coefficient (as you say) in the general case since you lack phase information." Phase information is not needed. It is true that the reflection coefficient is a vector ratio of the reflected voltage to the incident voltage at the load but this does not affect conversion of the reflection coefficient to the SWR. Reactance at the load has the same effect as adding a same-impedance line (of particular length) between the generator and load. This only shifts the SWR pattern on the line, but in a practical line has no effect on the minima and maxima on the line. SWR is simply the ratio of the maximmum amplitude to the minimum amplitude of voltage (or current) on the line in a particular region of the line. A maximum is displaced by 1/4-wave from a minimum. Phase information is irrelevant to conversion between reflection coefficient and SWR. That`s why Terman didn`t include it. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| RF filters and Impedance Matching | Homebrew | |||
| Calculus not needed (was: Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit) | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
| The two sorts of loss | Antenna | |||