LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old March 7th 06, 10:09 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Owen Duffy
 
Posts: n/a
Default Reflection Loss

On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 20:20:14 -0600, (Richard
Harrison) wrote:

Owen Duffy wrote:
"In formula 4-22b of my copy of Terman, the term on the lhs is |rho|
which is the magnitude of the reflection coefficient."

In my copy, 4-22b gives the "absolute value" of the reflection
coefficient (it is embraced with bars) which I believe means the
"absolute value" of a number or a symbol without reference to its
algebraic sign.

(4-22b):
+or- reflection coefficient=
SWR-1 / SWR+1

Richard, you seem to be dealing with reflection coefficient as a real
number when in fact it is a complex number. Your definition of |rho|
is inadequate when rho is complex.

Terman actually says in the preceding text "The standing wave ratio S
is one means of expressing the magnitude of the reflection
coefficient; the exact relationship between the two is..."

Your statement "On page 99 of Terman`s 1955 edition of "Electronic and
Radio Engineering" (my textbook was an earlier edition) is found the
formula to convert the reflection coefficient into SWR or vice versa.
These two parameters are innexorably locked together by formulas
(4-22a) and (4-22b)." is wrong where it says "convert the reflection
coefficient into SWR or vice versa" in respect of the "vice-versa"
because you ignore the fact that the reflection coefficient is a
complex quantity, and that the "magnitude of reflection coefficient"
is not the same thing as "reflection coefficient. You cannot calculate
the reflection coefficient from the SWR (except of course the special
case where SWR=1).

You have cited Terman in support of your own loose words, but Terman's
words are more carefully chosen and correct, yours are not, and the
Terman reference does not support your misconception at all.

Owen
--
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
RF filters and Impedance Matching Paul Burridge Homebrew 16 April 10th 04 01:29 PM
Calculus not needed (was: Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit) David or Jo Anne Ryeburn Antenna 17 December 13th 03 10:48 AM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
The two sorts of loss Reg Edwards Antenna 10 August 21st 03 07:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017