| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
March 7th 06, 07:04 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
Reflection Loss
Richard Harrison wrote:
Owen Duffy wrote: "Richard, You seem to be dealing with reflection coefficient as a real number when in fact it is a complex number." I plead guilty. OTOH, some text I have in my library treats 'rho' as a magnitude and 'gamma' as the complex reflection coefficient. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
|
#2
March 7th 06, 08:15 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reflection Loss
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:04:50 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote:
Richard Harrison wrote: Owen Duffy wrote: "Richard, You seem to be dealing with reflection coefficient as a real number when in fact it is a complex number." I plead guilty. OTOH, some text I have in my library treats 'rho' as a magnitude and 'gamma' as the complex reflection coefficient. Irespective of the symbol that may be used, and there are unfortunately many schemes, the reflection coefficient is a complex quantity. Owen -- |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| RF filters and Impedance Matching | Homebrew | |||
| Calculus not needed (was: Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit) | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
| The two sorts of loss | Antenna | |||
Hybrid Mode
