Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:04:50 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote:
Richard Harrison wrote: Owen Duffy wrote: "Richard, You seem to be dealing with reflection coefficient as a real number when in fact it is a complex number." I plead guilty. OTOH, some text I have in my library treats 'rho' as a magnitude and 'gamma' as the complex reflection coefficient. Irespective of the symbol that may be used, and there are unfortunately many schemes, the reflection coefficient is a complex quantity. Owen -- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
RF filters and Impedance Matching | Homebrew | |||
Calculus not needed (was: Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit) | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
The two sorts of loss | Antenna |