LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old March 10th 06, 07:00 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
 
Posts: n/a
Default Current through coils


Cecil Moore wrote:
A 75m bugcatcher coil used on 4 MHz is NOT significantly below
the self-resonant frequency of 9-10 MHz.


Yes it is, but no so far as to have perfectly equal currents at each
end an zero phase shift in current. It is in the neither land between a
Tesla coil (which is still nothing like my mobile antenna, but at least
getting closer) and a idealized lumped component.

THE LUMPED-CIRCUIT MODEL FAILS IN A STANDING
WAVE ENVIRONMENT! In the face of that simple technical fact,
all other discussion is moot. Anyone wishing to validly model a
75m bugcatcher coil used on a mobile antenna is forced to choose
a model that does not presuppose faster than light wave travel
through a 75m bugcatcher coil. It's as simple as that.


Nonsense. You are ignoring the coupling mechanisim inside the inductor.


Tom, with a straight face, I want you to assert that the RF waves
on a 75m bugcatcher mobile antenna are traveling faster than
the speed of light. If it takes 125 nanoseconds for the forward
current wave to make it from the end of the antenna and back
to the feedpoint, then the lumped-circuit model yields invalid
results. TDR anyone?


They are not travelling faster than light.

What you (and the one or two others who seem to agree with you)
repeatedly ignore or forget is magnetic flux couples one turn to
another. A real inductor is always someplace between the two extremes
of something like a radial mode helice (helically loaded whip) and an
ideal lumped component.

Since you have taken the path of totally forgetting or ignoring flux
coupling, you are reaching incorrect conclusions. Using the Tesla coil
model is a good example.

Everyone is freely admitting there is *some* transmission line effect
going on. There is some distrbuted component (a series of inductors
shunted by capacitors) going on.

Everyone (except you) is being careful to qualify remarks by specifying
the inductor is operating well below self-resonance.

If you weren't so pig-headed you could look at the measured data at:

http://www.w8ji.com/mobile_antenna_c...ts_at_w8ji.htm

....and see that as inductors move towards self-resonance they do begin
to display characteristics of transmission lines.

It's too bad in three years you have claimed others made a measurement
error, when in fact the error is in thinking all of the current in a
loading coil slowly winds its way around turn by turn and the magnetic
field linking turns does not cause charges in other turns to move long
before current traveleing at light speed would wind through the copper
path.

Until you stop, put the beer away, and think about this a while you'll
continue to butt your head up against people who KNOW how inductors
behave.

73 Tom

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Current in Loading Coils Cecil Moore Antenna 2 March 5th 06 08:26 PM
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems Paul Policy 0 January 10th 05 05:41 PM
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter Stephen G. Gulyas Scanner 17 December 7th 04 06:42 PM
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) Roy Lewallen Antenna 25 January 15th 04 09:11 PM
Current in antenna loading coils controversy Yuri Blanarovich Antenna 454 December 12th 03 03:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017