On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:09:40 -0800, Richard Clark
wrote:

On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 21:40:40 GMT, "Cecil Moore"
wrote:

Your 100uH coil above exhibits 60 degrees of phase shift
even for the voltage and that's 1/6 wavelength

On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:56:19 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote:

When the speculation is that the coil presents a 1:1 replacement for
the delay of the "missing" segment of the resonant antenna, then this
premise stumbles at the starting blocks.

Nobody said anything about a 1:1 replacement. That was just
somebody's strawman.

We all know who "somebody" is. [threadbuster #4]

But if this is news to you, it must have been one of your other
personalities (Hokum's Razor?) at the keyboard who posted the message
at the top.


:-) :-) :-) :-) :-)

It just occurred to me that those two posts were a week apart (more or
less) and denote a phase change (the one cancels the other if they
were to vectorally combined).

Thus and forever more, this proves that newsgroups (when heavily fed
from a source of confusion, linearly loaded with nonsense, and
terminated with a embarrassing revelation) exhibit transmission line
properties and can transform a stupid idea (at the top) into a
brilliant one (at the bottom) - or versa vice.

In conformance to transmission line properties, this cycle of phase
reversals is repeated every
1 / [1 + tan (c · Vf / posts)]² Years