Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roy Lewallen" wrote: The measurement looks good to me. The phase is exactly what EZNEC predicts -- constant along the wire. The ratio in magnitudes we'd expect depends on the positions along the wire, not just the spacing. We are not talking about the magnitude measurements right now. We are talking about the phase measurements. What good does it do to use a signal, whose phase is fixed, to measure the phase shift through a coil or through a wire. The phase is constant along the wire with or without the presence of a coil. Why then is a phase shift of zero on both sides of the coil surprising? And of what importance is that measurement? -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |