Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jerry Martes wrote:
I've read more than 80% of the posts in this thread. I still dont understand the objective. Since the foundation of other's measurements was the use of standing wave current phase to prove the percentage of a wavelength occupied by a loading coil is zero, my objective was simple: To prove that the standing wave current, with its unchanging phase, cannot be used to make a valid measurement of the percentage of a wavelength occupied by a loading coil. I proved that using the standing wave current phase to measure the percentage of a wavelength occupied by a wire or a whip also yields an answer of zero. If the coil plus the whip both occupy a percentage of a wavelength equal to zero, all sorts of laws of physics are violated. Not to mention a full length 1/2WL wire dipole occupying a percentage of a wavelength equal to zero. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |